Ever since I started reading the Harry Potter books years ago I have loved the series. After the first and second movies were made (which were my least favorites of the whole series), I was excited because the actual
really good books were going to be adapted to film. The first of which being the third one,
The Prisoner of Azkaban, which is definitely my favorite book of the entire series thus far.
The Prisoner of Azkaban opened about a week ago grossing a crap load of money and tons of fan service with rumors that it was the best movie yetwhich didnt surprise me at the least. Yesterday I went to see this movie after the sour distaste of the Garfield movie and I have to say that I enjoyed this one more.
In case you dont know, the Harry Potter books burst onto the scene in 1999 with the first book titled
Harry Potter and The Sorcerers Stone. It was a hit overnight and its still a success today with five books with still two more to come. Its a series involving a young boy who finds hes a wizard and through all of his struggles and his deep past is a hero whos quite modest and loyal to his friends. He goes to a school named Hogwarts and quickly masters the arts of magic. All seven books are to follow his stay at the school and this is the third movie with four more to go (if the actors and actresses are still interested by the time that all of them are supposed to be done).
The onslaught of Summer movies has begun with movies such as
Troy,
Garfield,
The Chronicles of Riddick, and
The Day After Tomorrow, but out of the ones Ive seen so far, this one is definitely my favorite. What makes The Prisoner of Azkaban so good is that it acts as a stand-alone title (which its not) to make people understand the series in case theyve never heard of J.K. Rowling (the author) or the first two films. Thats very extraordinary and a good thing.
Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Azkaban starts in England with Harry living with his aunt, uncle, and cousinthe Dursleys. These folks have been mean to him every since he was a little kid when they adopted him after his parents died. Well, after an incident involving one of his family members blowing up like a balloon, he gets angry and leaves. He runs away only to catch the Night Bus that takes him to London and to the bus station that takes the kids all to Hogwarts. Are you lost? After a while you start to find out that a man by the name of Siris Black has escaped from a magical (and most lethal) prison named Azkaban and that he may have something to do with the death of Harrys folks.
Sure enough you soon find out the truth, but thats after Harry Potter has started his third year at Hogwarts, gotten into a lot of mischief with his two friends, Ron and Hermione, and facing up against the dark Dementors (who roam the grounds of the school trying to find Siris). Through a story of humor, magic, and drama you soon find out just how this plays a role with the other films and how its much better.
Just to tell you, in case you dont already know, this is a
magic movie. Although not in the vein of the popular
Lord Of The Rings movies, it does try to be epic and really mature, but it just isnt as high maintenance as the previously mentioned trilogy, but thats not a bad thing. And did anyone notice that was a run-on sentence? Anyway, from experience I can tell you this: if you dont have any interest in magic then youll still like this movie because its fun for the whole family due to the narrative standpoint that you can easily relate with on some level. Although the movies in the past have been strongly for kids and the acting was a little shallow, its happy to say that this book/movie is the beginning of the Dark years and the music expresses the desolate and black plain that the movie is based on.
Making appearances in The Prisoner of Azkaban are some truly memorable folks. First off you have Gary Oldman playing the Siris Black role and although hes not as warm as his other movies in this one, he does do a great job for a villain. I find that his relationship with certain characters in the movie didnt really work so well and he was barely in the flick besides having his face on glaring and screaming flyers scattered everywhere. Another good guy is David Thewlis who plays Professor Lupin who takes over for The Defense Against The Dark Arts class (which is cursed or something since every year theres a new teacher). Is it just me or is it a good thing that hes finally playing a good guy instead of a bad fellow? Anyway, although his mustache is a little hard to watch, he brings some warmth and dignity to the movie with his portrayal of a haunting man trying to cope with his past and you find out more about him along the way.
Finally you have the charming, cuddly, cutesy, awesome, and inspiring kids of the flick. First off you have Daniel Radcliffe who plays Harry Potter. Sure, youre probably annoyed with how hes on every magazine cover and sure hell probably not get any more acting jobs ever again and probably only appear at conventions like The Lord Of The Rings cast, but hes still good. In the first two films he was hard to look at because he was going through puberty at the time and his acting really suffered (it was bad). Now, hes much better than ever further chiseling at his character to create something that livens up the character from the book.
Next you have Emma Watson who plays Hermione and in the first and second movie I could hardly stand her. Now...shes a blossoming young woman....whod Id like to take to the movie on time. Shes pretty now and he acting has gotten fairly better although when she gets excited on screen she stumbles. Rupert Grint (you can just tell all of these blokes are British, eh?) acts out the character of Ron Weasley, a poor guy a part of a poor family, who is dealing with himself growing up and growing...attracted to Hermione. Shes mine, Rupert! Back off! Anyway, he didnt have a very large role in this one and he was sort of added in as comic relief which I didnt like since I was always quite fond of him in the movies. Oh, well. Hell have a big part in the fourth movie,
The Goblet Of Fire which is supposed to come out next year (hopefully).
Chris Columbus steps off of the broom for this time out to the Harry Potter universe and is replaced by Alfonso Cuaron. Its a really odd choice that they picked him to direct because the only movies that I can recall him doing was
A Little Princess and some foreign erotic film. Pretty weird, huh? He, in my mind, breaks it even with the director of
Mrs. Doubtfire in a lot of ways. First of all, their skills are pretty similar from backdrops, gliding techniques, and some lighting effects, but its more than that. They way that he pushed the characters to the limit acting wise made him far more engaging than the previous director. Something thats awful, though, is how on some parts of the movie I felt as if I was watching a cheesy kids show because his direction was sort of sloppy. On the whole his directing was good. Thats all you need to know.
Although there was some healthy Quidditch scenes in the first couple of movies, the lack of Quidditch (which is a game like soccer or football played on broomsticks) is mesmerizing. There should have been more Quidditch, dammit! For people who have loved the sport being played in the previous films, you will have a moment of happiness before it is interrupted by a Dementor. I wish the Quidditch part was longer, but in the fourth movie there is going to be tons of the gameguaranteed (trust me).
Id say that this is one of my favorite summer movies to come out this summer so far. It has all of the qualities that anyone could ever love like plenty of action, suspense (if you havent read the book already), excitement, and just pure fun. The movie has its share of funny moments brought you mostly by Rupert Grint, but there is some occasional off-color humor that youll easily get a chuckle with. The CGI graphics from the first two flicks have been overhauled and replaced with extraordinary graphics that really make the movie shine much brighter than the previous adaptations. A years amount of work went into the computer animation and you can sure tell when you see the finished product. Hopefully youll give this movie a chance and Im happy to say that its the best one yet. Definitely worth a buy, but until then its really worth it to see it on the big screen. Five stars.
© Jason Haskins, 2004
JiggyJay
Related Reviews
Harry Potter and The Sorcerers Stone (Book) ~
Harry Potter and The Order Of The Phoenix (Book) ~
Harry Potter and The Chamber Of Secrets (Movie)